Rightly to be great / Is not to stir without great argument, / But greatly to find quarrel in a straw / When honour's at the stake.
Act IV, Scene 4 · Hamlet
Context
Still reflecting on Fortinbras's example, Hamlet argues that true greatness lies not in avoiding conflict, but in being willing to fight fiercely over small matters when honor is at stake.
Analysis
The chiasmus—'not to stir without great argument, / But greatly to find quarrel in a straw'—flips the expected logic, making 'greatness' depend on the intensity of response rather than the significance of the cause. The word 'straw' (echoing the Captain's 'little patch of ground') is deliberately trivial, yet Hamlet insists that fighting 'greatly' over it is noble if 'honour's at the stake.' This reasoning is circular and unstable: he's trying to justify Fortinbras's absurd war by redefining greatness itself, revealing how desperately he wants to believe action—any action—is virtuous.
Essay Tip
Use this to argue that Hamlet's logic in this soliloquy is self-serving and contradictory—he redefines honor to make reckless action look noble, which shows he's trying to talk himself into violence rather than genuinely believing in it, exposing the gap between his rhetoric and his convictions.